

ABOUT US
The SCRP Philosophy
Risk is more than a management buzzword. It is an advanced mathematical concept rooted in probability and statistics—core to how we understand uncertainty.
Over the past 370 years, the application of risk has expanded beyond gaming and insurance into warfare, economics, and management science. Today, nearly every discipline—from finance to physics—relies on probabilistic logic.
Nobel laureates such as Albert Einstein (photoelectric effect, 1921), Niels Bohr (quantum theory, 1922), Harry Markowitz (portfolio theory, 1990), John Nash (game theory, 1994), and Kip Thorne (black holes, 2017) have used probability theory to drive some of the most profound breakthroughs in science and economics.
Risk marks the boundary between ancient reasoning and modern intelligence. The world’s leading companies now stay ahead by embedding probabilistic models into products, strategies, and decision-making—through artificial intelligence, and beyond.
​

Divergence and Rise of Enterprise Risk Management
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) gained prominence in the early 2000s, catalyzed by financial crises across developing markets in the 1990s. In response, regulators began embedding risk protocols into corporate governance frameworks to protect investors, the public, and markets.
​
This regulatory shift created a sudden demand for risk specialists. Lacking in-house capability, many firms turned to business consultants who, drawing from financial services, popularized simplified ordinal models—high–medium–low and red–yellow–green risk matrices. These frameworks, while accessible, were never designed for structural risk modeling or probabilistic rigor.
Yet risk is fundamentally a scientific construct, rooted in:
-
Causality – the interdependence of events and triggering conditions
-
Probability – the quantification of uncertainty
-
Consequence – the impact spectrum of outcomes
Excluding these renders risk analysis speculative and reactive.
This divergence between normative risk theory and actual practice reflects deeper cognitive biases. The Dunning-Kruger effect may explain how confident adoption of simplified tools persists despite limited technical grounding. At an organizational level, heuristic dominance and compliance bias incentivize adherence to frameworks perceived as good enough—especially when regulations focus more on procedural demonstration than analytical depth.
​
The most widely adopted framework, ISO 31000, includes ISO 31010—70% of which is dedicated to advanced methods such as Bayesian inference, Markov chains, and Monte Carlo simulations. However, few adopters apply these techniques in practice, creating a widening gap between declared alignment and actual execution.
​
ERM, as introduced in AS/NZS 4360:1995, was a product of regulatory necessity—not methodological readiness. Consulting models filled the void with intuitive proxies for probabilistic logic. The result: some of the most catastrophic financial collapses occurred after ERM became institutionalized. Of the 10 largest bankruptcies in recorded history, half occurred in the financial sector, where ERM was most heavily embedded.
Need to Converge Science and Management for More Effective Risk Management

Macy Conference: Cybernetic Roundtable, New York, 1947.
John Von Neumann (2nd fr. left), Norbert Wiener (3rd fr. right)

Cybernetics Schema
"Simplicity before understanding is simplistic. Simplicity after understanding is simple".
Edward De Bono
Author of 'Lateral Thinking' and 'Simplicity'.
The Macy Conferences (1941–1960) laid the foundation of cybernetics—an interdisciplinary science of control and communication across biological, mechanical, and social systems. Pioneers like Norbert Wiener, W. Ross Ashby, and Alan Turing defined principles that remain foundational to system regulation.
​
Wiener described cybernetics as “the scientific study of control and communication in the animal and the machine.” This same lens applies to risk management—where economic, environmental, and social systems interact with organizations, and outcomes must be steered through data, feedback, and intervention.
Ross Ashby’s Law of Requisite Variety states that control systems must match or exceed the complexity of what they seek to regulate. Turning on a light or pushing a call button appears simple—but is powered by vast engineering infrastructure. The same applies to risk.
​
In the 1950s, Stafford Beer brought cybernetics into management science, arguing that organizational viability depends on internal variety—diverse capabilities tuned to external complexity.
Today, enterprise risk management remains far too reductive. Most practices operate below the minimum systemic complexity required for effective control.
Risk without probability and statistics is not risk management—it is ritual.
Addressing modern uncertainty requires a convergence of science, engineering, and business into a unified, systems-based approach to risk.
The SCRP Platform
The founders of SCRP were driven by a pivotal shift: risk management becoming mainstream through regulatory mandates from securities commissions, stock exchanges, and governments. This marked a rare alignment between corporate governance and management cybernetics.
​
We saw immense potential—better decisions, stronger institutions, and public value—through scientifically grounded risk methods. The core challenge was bridging the gap between scientific rigor and executive action. This required a new framework, supported by practical, collaborative tools.
​
Since our founding in 2017, SCRP has convened leaders across corporate, financial, scientific, academic, and policy sectors, hosting roundtables on sustainability, taxation, technology, and trade. These served as testbeds for a cooperative risk management model.
​
At its foundation, SCRP is a scalable platform built on:
-
A conducive collaborative environment
-
An aligned reward system
-
Structured knowledge infrastructure
-
A technically sound, universal risk process​
SCRP is more than a framework—it is an advanced mechanism for measuring uncertainty and enabling innovation through cross-sector collaboration.

"The most important questions of life are, for the most part, really only problems of probability".
Pierre Simon De Laplace, 1812